-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I preferred the older format as I could then see the report of every team out there and gather ideas and some stimulation from the efforts of others whilst at the same time sharing my own experience and that of the rest of the team. Both formats are easier, both have benefits. The benefits of the new one is an easy archive for anyone who is interested in a peculiar team they can just read their meeting page but if they want to compare two teams in a certain month they need to open two tabs or more to do that. As you can probably tell I am rather undecided by it and haven't made up my mind! Lets see what others think too then :).
Kind Regards, Christopher Swift 2009/6/6 Nathan Handler <nhand...@ubuntu.com>: > On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Nathan Handler<nhand...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> In an effort to make it easier for teams to maintain their report >> pages, I am proposing moving towards a new reporting style that takes >> advantage of the 'Include' feature on the wiki. > > Since sending this email out, many teams have switched to the new > style. Now, I am interested in hearing what everyone thinks about it. > Do you find it easier than the old style? Is there something that you > would do differently? Do you flat out not like the new style? Whatever > the feedback is, I am interested in hearing it. > > Nathan > > -- > loco-contacts mailing list > loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoq7CoACgkQYckxdhCgq47ANgCdEPvhCdHQTtVOLb3TnQrydY9/ 2+4An2o6ZCES+RT6eGj9bv21uS4ymelh =8IrT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- loco-contacts mailing list loco-contacts@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/loco-contacts
