> > if this means that ConvertUNION doesn't have to > > muck around with fixing up padding elements anymore, > > can you please remove that code. > > I don't know why that code is there (it goes back to the first svn > checkin) but I don't think anything I did would make it unnecessary.
I guess it is there because what is padding for one union field may not be padding for another. If there is now a map from the gcc type to the padding info, then this should, I suppose, be tweaked so it doesn't change the padding info for the type of the field, but for the type of the union. Ciao, Duncan. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
