On Feb 6, 2008, at 5:33 AM, Gabor Greif wrote: > Here my 2 cent: Thanks Gabor. I wasn't really ready for review, but I appreciate it :)
> +<p>The <a href="http://clang.llvm.org/";>clang project</a> is an > effort > +to build a set of new front-end technology for the LLVM optimizer > and code > ^ > technologies Fixed. > +generator. Currently, its C and Objective-C support is maturing > nicely, and it > +has advanced source-to-source analysis and transformation > capabilities. If you > +are interested in building source-level tools for C and Objective-C > (and > +eventually C++), you should take a look. However, note that clang > is not an > +official part of the LLVM 2.2 release. If you are interested in > this project, > +please see the web site and check it out from SVN head.</p> > > Comment that it is developed in sync with llvm SVN head ? I just removed where the check it out. > In the doc: > "main focuses" --?--> "main foci" ? > "using MinGW libraries (native)" --> "using MinGW libraries (native)." Ok. > "The -cee pass is known to be buggy, and may be removed in a future > release." > Is it already gone in 2.2 or on SVN head? SVN Head, I clarified. > "The Linux PPC32/ABI support needs testing for the interpreter and > static compilation, and lacks support for debug information." > IIRC this has been fixed. I'm pretty sure there are still significant issues, with varargs for example. > "llvm-gcc4 does" > llvm-gcc4.0 or llvm-gcc4.2 ? Fixed. Neither! -Chris _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
