On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:32 PM, Anton Korobeynikov wrote:

> Hello, Chris
>
>> This sort of thing won't work when the string is empty and checking  
>> is
>> enabled.  Maybe something like this is enough:
>>   if (Key.empty()) return find(0,0);
> Will find() operate sane in such case (supplying NULL pointer as  
> input)?

Sure, it's a zero length range, so it would be invalid to dereference  
either pointer.

-Chris
_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits

Reply via email to