This test is failing for me. llvm-gcc-4.0, x86 darwin8. -Tanya
On Jan 25, 2008, at 2:36 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > Author: lattner > Date: Fri Jan 25 16:36:24 2008 > New Revision: 46372 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=46372&view=rev > Log: > add a testcase for a bug Duncan pointed out. > > Added: > llvm/trunk/test/CFrontend/2008-01-25-ByValReadNone.c > > Added: llvm/trunk/test/CFrontend/2008-01-25-ByValReadNone.c > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/trunk/test/CFrontend/ > 2008-01-25-ByValReadNone.c?rev=46372&view=auto > > ====================================================================== > ======== > --- llvm/trunk/test/CFrontend/2008-01-25-ByValReadNone.c (added) > +++ llvm/trunk/test/CFrontend/2008-01-25-ByValReadNone.c Fri Jan 25 > 16:36:24 2008 > @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ > +// RUN: %llvmgcc -O3 -S -o - -emit-llvm %s | grep readonly > +// RUN: %llvmgcc -O3 -S -o - -emit-llvm %s | not grep readnone > + > + > +// The struct being passed byval means that we need to mark the > +// function readonly instead of readnone. Readnone would allow > +// stores to the arg to be deleted in the caller. > +struct S { int A[1000]; }; > +int __attribute__ ((const)) f(struct S x) { return x.A[0]; } > + > > > _______________________________________________ > llvm-commits mailing list > llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
