Hi Chris,
> + LegalizeAction getTruncStoreAction(MVT::ValueType ValVT,
> + MVT::ValueType MemVT) const {
> + assert(ValVT < MVT::LAST_VALUETYPE && MemVT < 32 &&
what is 32? Did you mean <= LAST_INTEGER_VALUETYPE or something? Now I
come to notice it, it is bad that you have to use < for LAST_VALUE_TYPE
but <= for LAST_INTEGER_VALUETYPE and friends...
> + void setTruncStoreAction(MVT::ValueType ValVT, MVT::ValueType MemVT,
> + LegalizeAction Action) {
> + assert(ValVT < MVT::LAST_VALUETYPE && MemVT < 32 &&
Again the magic 32.
> - /// isStoreXLegal - Return true if the specified store with truncation is
> + /// isTruncStoreLegal - Return true if the specified store with truncation
> is
> /// legal on this target.
> - bool isStoreXLegal(MVT::ValueType VT) const {
> - return getStoreXAction(VT) == Legal || getStoreXAction(VT) == Custom;
> + bool isTruncStoreLegal(MVT::ValueType ValVT, MVT::ValueType MemVT) const {
> + return getTruncStoreAction(ValVT, MemVT) == Legal ||
> + getTruncStoreAction(ValVT, MemVT) == Custom;
> }
It would be more friendly to have isStoreXLegal return false if VT or MemVT is
an extended value type, rather than having it assert in getTruncStoreAction...
> + // If this is an FP_ROUND or TRUNC followed by a store, fold this into a
> + // truncating store. We can do this even if this is already a truncstore.
> + if ((Value.getOpcode() == ISD::FP_ROUND || Value.getOpcode() ==
> ISD::TRUNCATE)
> + && TLI.isTypeLegal(Value.getOperand(0).getValueType()) &&
> + Value.Val->hasOneUse() && ST->isUnindexed() &&
> + TLI.isTruncStoreLegal(Value.getOperand(0).getValueType(),
> + ST->getStoredVT())) {
For example, this will assert if ST->getStoredVT() >= 32, eg an apfloat (!).
Also,
before legalize this could be done whether all these guys are legal or not I
suppose.
> + case Expand:
> + // Just store the low part. This may become a non-trunc store, so
> make
> + // sure to use getTruncStore, not UpdateNodeOperands below.
> + ExpandOp(ST->getValue(), Tmp3, Tmp4);
> + return DAG.getTruncStore(Tmp1, Tmp3, Tmp2, ST->getSrcValue(),
> + SVOffset, MVT::i8, isVolatile, Alignment);
This may be wrong for apints, since the expanded value type may be smaller than
ST->getStoredVT(), eg if you are expanding i64, and ST->getStoredVT() is i40. I
can take care of this.
Ciao,
Duncan.
_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
