> If a struct field is marked as a bitfield but > didn't need to be, treat it like an ordinary > field. The Ada front-end likes to mark fields > as bitfields preemptively, so this can occur > quite often for Ada. What is more, it can > mark non-integer fields as bitfields. In all > examples I came across so far, these non-integer > bitfields can be treated like ordinary fields. > With this patch, the Ada front-end builds (but > does not bootstrap)! It is true that the problem > of non-integer bitfields could be handled in the > Ada front-end, but since ignoring silly bitfields > seems like a good idea for all front-ends I chose > to solve it in the generic code.
I forgot to mention the testcase: FrontendAda/non_bitfield.ads. Duncan. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
