On Dec 19, 2007, at 5:03 PM, Evan Cheng wrote: > Sorry, the check in comment and some of the code is wrong. What it > should say is "is all other uses are address and iv reuse for those > are possible, then ignore the PHI use." In that case, an extra > multiplication is needed (for PHI), but it eliminates an iv because > the multiplication is folded into other uses. It turns out to be a > good trade. > > I'll fix this in a bit. > Ok!
-Chris _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
