On Dec 17, 2007 4:31 PM, Chris Lattner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 4:29 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > > > On Dec 17, 2007, at 2:17 PM, Bill Wendling wrote: > > > >> Author: void > >> Date: Mon Dec 17 16:17:14 2007 > >> New Revision: 45128 > >> > >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=45128&view=rev > >> Log: > >> LD_Fp64m should have "isRematerializable" set. > > > > It should? > > Oh right, because isReallyTriviallyReMaterializable handles it. > > Doh, I hate that flag :-) > LOL. Yeah, it's not 100% great. I also added the isRemat flag to other functions that that method deals with (and marked them appropriately for LICM).
-bw _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
