>>>> I definitely agree, which is why I added it in the first place :). >>>> The problem is that it isn't hooked up with any of the other >>>> diagnostics machinery, so it isn't controllable and doesn't give >>>> decent location info (for example). >>>> >>>> I don't know that it really provides a good user experience. In >>>> the >>>> LTO case with debug info, we could do better. >>> >>> So what's your idea, detect it somewhere else? Where were you >>> thinking? >> >> For now I think we just just disable the warning. > > I'd prefer to wait until the replacement is in place, if you're OK > with that.
I'm ok with that, but please reevaluate if it is causing chaos in the testsuite :) -Chris _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
