> > No, -w doesn't work to suppress that message (llvm doesn't have a > mechanism to > suppress it).
Aaah. > Considering this is undefined behavior, I'm not > convinced this is > the wrong thing, although your first reaction would be that -w should > suppress > everything. I could probably be convinced it should be a hard error > though. > > These tests are incorrect source and I think not running them is OK. Well, undefined, not incorrect. I think the tests are valid if undefined C code that the compiler should accept - but maybe warn about. -eric _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
