On Dec 13, 2007, at 5:52 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Dec 13, 2007, at 4:54 PM, Devang Patel wrote: >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=45017&view=rev >> Log: >> Set libllvmgcc.dylib compatibility version number. >> >> Modified: >> llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/Makefile.in >> >> Modified: llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/Makefile.in >> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/ >> Makefile.in?rev=45017&r1=45016&r2=45017&view=diff >> >> = >> ===================================================================== >> ======== >> --- llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/Makefile.in (original) >> +++ llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc/Makefile.in Thu Dec 13 18:54:36 2007 >> @@ -1209,7 +1209,7 @@ >> echo $(LLVMLIBFILES) >> $(CXX) $(DYLIB_COMPILE_FLAGS) $(INCLUDES) -o $@ \ >> $< $(LLVMLIBFILES) -L/usr/lib/gcc/$(build)/4.0.1/ - >> dynamiclib -single_module \ >> - -install_name @executable_path/$@ >> + -compatibility_version 1.0.0 -current_version 1.0.0 - >> install_name @executable_path/$@ > > is -L.../4.0.1 really right?
hmm.. no. Actually, I don't understand why -L../4.x.1 is required here. I'll investigate. - Devang _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
