On Nov 8, 2007, at 2:48 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Nov 8, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> >> On Nov 8, 2007, at 2:39 PM, Devang Patel wrote: >> >>> >>> On Nov 8, 2007, at 2:35 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: >>> >>>> The error message is clean, >>>> but something like dg-require would be even better. >>> >>> >>> We do not have anything like dg-require. >>> >> >> What is dg-require?
It checks whether target supports particular feature or not before running the test. >> >> >> If you can tell me how to get if llvm-gcc is 64 bit, I can see what I >> can do. >> > > How about: > > XREQUIRE: llvm-gcc -xc /dev/null -S -o /dev/null -m64 > > If that command returns success, then the -m64 option is supported. > > Crazy? Reasonable? Reasonable from user's point of view :) If XREQUIRE return success then only test is run otherwise test is not run. - Devang _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
