On Thursday 18 October 2007 10:56:40 Bill Wendling wrote: > On Oct 18, 2007, at 1:45 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > > >>> Thanks Bill, the patch looks fine. This needs a testcase and needs > >>> to be applied to 4.2 if it has the same problem, > >>> > >> Will do. > > > > In 4.2 the unwind-resume function is configurable. For objc with > > SJLJ > > exceptions it should be _Unwind_SjLj_Resume. If this is not > > correct for > > objc, this can be changed in objc_init_exceptions. > > > In the case of this fix, we don't want to use even > _Unwind_SjLj_Resume (it's what I tried initially and got the same > type of error).
So how do you continue unwinding exceptions? If code should never get to the unwind block then you can always make the unwind-resume function be a call to abort() for objc with sjlj. That said, I suggest you read the comments in ada/raise.c starting from line 368 (llvm-gcc-4.0). I would be amazed if sjlj really works without proper tables, except in easy cases. Best wishes, Duncan. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
