On Sep 28, 2007, at 10:00 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:

> Hi Dale,
>>
>>    def int_powi_f32 : Intrinsic<[llvm_float_ty, llvm_float_ty,
>> llvm_i32_ty]>;
>>    def int_powi_f64 : Intrinsic<[llvm_double_ty, llvm_double_ty,
>> llvm_i32_ty]>;
>> +  def int_powi_f80 : Intrinsic<[llvm_f80_ty, llvm_f80_ty,
>> llvm_i32_ty]>;
>> +  def int_powi_f128 : Intrinsic<[llvm_f128_ty, llvm_f128_ty,
>> llvm_i32_ty]>;
>> +  def int_powi_ppcf128 : Intrinsic<[llvm_ppcf128_ty,  
>> llvm_ppcf128_ty,
>> +                                    llvm_i32_ty]>;
>>  }
>
> Why not use anyfp?  This would allow us to have one sqrt and one powi
> definition.

Hard to explain; it just feels like the sort of thing where all the  
values ought to be spelled out.

_______________________________________________
llvm-commits mailing list
llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits

Reply via email to