On Aug 24, 2007, at 4:40 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> I think that you can just remove this and the compiler will give you >>> a compile-time error if you try to use it. If you define it like >>> this, you just get a link-time error. >> >> Yep, and the linker error message doesn't tell you where the >> reference is coming from (I'm speaking from experience). I mostly >> did it this way because I see about 40 other places it was done this >> way, and I do see the utility as a statement of intent. Why is this >> one different? > > The difference here is that C++ compilers automatically synthesis > copy ctors and default ctors and operator=, but they don't do the > same for operator==. To disable these automatically generated > members, you have to "define" them, and put them in the private part > of the class (so any users will get compile-time access violation > errors as well as link errors).
Still learning that language. OK then, I'll comment it out. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
