> Looking at it a little more, I think the instcombine folds are actually > wrong here. For example, it does X + undef -> undef, but that's wrong if > X is a NaN.
Right, that's why I suggested X + undef -> X. Ciao, Duncan. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
