On Jun 1, 2007, at 12:56 PM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Dale, > >> Arrange for only 1 of multiple branches to landing pad to be kept.
That should be "successors", not "branches", but you've gotten past that.... > it struck me that this patch seems to assume that if a successor > is a landing pad then it is necessarily a landing pad for the > current MBB. I wasn't intending to assume that; how so? > But couldn't it be the landing pad for some other > MBB, and simply a normal successor for the current one? It could; there is no way to tell from the CFG information. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
