On May 18, 2007, at 3:08 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > While doing some experiments with vector ValueTypes, I noticed that > > the PowerPC target uses MVT::LAST_VECTOR_VALUETYPE inconsistently with > > the way it is declared. I don't have the resources to test PowerPC > > changes, so I'm just sending this patch to the list in case anyone > > who does is interested in it. > > The patch looks safe to me, but how is it semantically different?
It would make the for loop cover v2f64, where it didn't before. Dan -- Dan Gohman, Cray Inc. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
