On Apr 4, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 17:37 -0700, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> Implement the llvm.bit.part_select.iN.iN.iN overloaded intrinsic. >> >> Urr? This is obviously incorrect. I'd much rather have the code >> generator assert and die on an unsupported intrinsic than to >> miscompile it silently. > > Okay, but you DID approve this in the plan.
I did not approve silently miscompiling the code. I'm fine with it aborting if you don't want to implement the lowering code. -Chris _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
