> + the GPL). This is not a problem for the main LLVM > distribution (which is already licensed under a more liberal license), but > may > be a problem if you intend to base commercial development on llvm-gcc > without > redistributing your source code.</p>
Maybe you should make explicit that there is no problem using llvm-gcc to compile proprietary code - there is only a problem if parts of llvm-gcc are included in the proprietary program. You do say that more or less a few lines before, but this last sentence could great doubt in peoples minds. Maybe you could offload the problem onto gcc, and say that compiling a program with llvm-gcc is like compiling it with gcc, and give a link to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html which discusses these issues. Ciao, Duncan. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
