Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2007, at 2:01 PM, Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> Well, I'm using the most recent version of both llvm and llvm-gcc >> (revision 254). 21 of the failures are ARM, but I don't care about >> those. llvm-test is still running, but it's on track to matching the >> 275 failures I got the last time I ran it. >> >> I'm not going to switch to Linux or OS X or even 32-bit FreeBSD, and I'm >> not going to spend the time figuring out why LLVM hates 64-bit >> FreeBSD--especially as it's getting worse, not better--and it's clear no >> one else is going to spend the time either. So I'm putting LLVM back on >> hold until later this year and hopefully the situation will be better >> then. > > Fair enough. However, unless *someone* on 64-bit freebsd > investigates, it won't get better. There is not much we can do about > this. > > -Chris > > True enough, but that someone will not be me. I estimate that the work required exceeds the benefits of me using LLVM. The imbalance is far worse on Windows. And as if to prove the point, llvm-test has just finished, with a record 287 failures. So after fixing 5 of them, another 12 have started failing.
_______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
