Applied, thanks! On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Duncan Sands wrote:
> EXACT_DIV_EXPR can be used on signed operands, so it is wrong to > always > turn it into UDiv. Since EXACT_DIV_EXPR always gives the same > result as > TRUNC_DIV_EXPR (it exists in gcc because it might give that result > faster > on some targets, not because it gives a different result), it is > pointless > to distinguish between the two in LLVM. _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits