Changes in directory llvm/docs:
GetElementPtr.html updated: 1.13 -> 1.14 --- Log message: Fix validation problem --- Diffs of the changes: (+3 -3) GetElementPtr.html | 6 +++--- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: llvm/docs/GetElementPtr.html diff -u llvm/docs/GetElementPtr.html:1.13 llvm/docs/GetElementPtr.html:1.14 --- llvm/docs/GetElementPtr.html:1.13 Wed Aug 16 22:25:07 2006 +++ llvm/docs/GetElementPtr.html Wed Aug 16 22:26:50 2006 @@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ <pre> X = &Foo[0].F;</pre> <p>Sometimes this question gets rephrased as:</p> - <blockquote><i>Why is it okay to index through the first pointer, but - subsequent pointers won't be dereferenced?</i></blockquote> + <blockquote><p><i>Why is it okay to index through the first pointer, but + subsequent pointers won't be dereferenced?</i></p></blockquote> <p>The answer is simply because memory does not have to be accessed to perform the computation. The first operand to the GEP instruction must be a value of a pointer type. The value of the pointer is provided directly to @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer";><img src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-html401"; alt="Valid HTML 4.01!" /></a> <a href="http://llvm.org";>The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure</a><br/> - Last modified: $Date: 2006/08/17 03:25:07 $ + Last modified: $Date: 2006/08/17 03:26:50 $ </address> </body> </html> _______________________________________________ llvm-commits mailing list llvm-commits@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvm-commits
