| Issue |
174989
|
| Summary |
UnaryOperator spelling empty, opcode not exposed to Python bindings
|
| Labels |
new issue
|
| Assignees |
|
| Reporter |
dkaszews
|
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/98489 fixes `BinaryOperator` by adding the opcode (`+`, `=`, etc.) to the spelling and making it available to Python bindings via new property `clang.cindex.cursor.binary_operator`.
Analogous work still has to be done for `UnaryOperator`, as there is still no way to distinguish e.g. `&x` from `*x` or `+x`.
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
