Issue 138259
Summary [X86] X86LegalizerInfo - use LegalFor instead if LegalIf for simple ISA/test pairs
Labels good first issue, backend:X86, llvm:globalisel
Assignees
Reporter RKSimon
    We have lots of arg/result common type cases like:
```cpp
 getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_ADD, G_SUB})
      .legalIf([=](const LegalityQuery &Query) -> bool {
        if (typeInSet(0, {s8, s16, s32})(Query))
          return true;
        if (Is64Bit && typeInSet(0, {s64})(Query))
          return true;
        if (HasSSE2 && typeInSet(0, {v16s8, v8s16, v4s32, v2s64})(Query))
          return true;
        if (HasAVX2 && typeInSet(0, {v32s8, v16s16, v8s32, v4s64})(Query))
 return true;
        if (HasAVX512 && typeInSet(0, {v16s32, v8s64})(Query))
          return true;
        if (HasBWI && typeInSet(0, {v64s8, v32s16})(Query))
          return true;
        return false;
 })
```
which should be simplified to use the legalFor({Types}) or legalFor(Pred, {Types}) helpers:
```cpp
 getActionDefinitionsBuilder({G_ADD, G_SUB})
      .legalFor({s8, s16, s32})
      .legalFor(Is64Bit, {s64})
      .legalFor(HasSSE2, {v16s8, v8s16, v4s32, v2s64})
 --- etc ---
```
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs

Reply via email to