| Issue |
133089
|
| Summary |
[clang-format] AllowShortFunctionsOnASingleLine=Inline does not respect macros
|
| Labels |
clang-format
|
| Assignees |
|
| Reporter |
rafzi
|
I stumbled upon https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/60627 which describes this same issue. Over there, the conclusion seems to be wont-fix because the intention of the related change (https://reviews.llvm.org/D117142) was to fix exactly the reported case.
However, I'd argue that a slight modification to the example is an unintended regression. If macros hide the "class" token, the scope is not correctly detected.
```
#define MY_THING(name) class name##Thing final
MY_THING(Foo)
{
int func() { return 7; }
}
```
is formatted to:
```
#define MY_THING(name) class name##Thing final
MY_THING(Foo)
{
int func()
{
return 7;
}
}
```
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
