| Issue |
129382
|
| Summary |
Why isn't the inline namespace written to __PRETTY_FUNCTION__?
|
| Labels |
new issue
|
| Assignees |
|
| Reporter |
sabudilovskiy
|
Why isn't the inline namespace written to __PRETTY_FUNCTION__? I was implementing name_of_type<T> for all platforms and suddenly found behavior on clang that differs from all other compilers: for some reason, inline namespaces aren't written to __PRETTY_FUNCTION__. Is this done intentionally?
https://godbolt.org/z/M5d5szxTo
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
