| Issue |
89695
|
| Summary |
void arguments in function types are not accepted
|
| Labels |
new issue
|
| Assignees |
|
| Reporter |
Halalaluyafail3
|
While looking at the behavior for qualified void return types (which clang gets wrong) I found that clang doesn't accept void function arguments. For example:
```c
void f(void x);
```
This code should be valid just like how the following is accepted:
```c
void g(struct undef x);
```
Both `f` and `g` have arguments of incomplete types but that is OK as long as these functions aren't called and because these are not function definitions. However, clang seems to diagnose `f` which is incorrect.
![]()
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
