https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50735
Allen zhong <zhongyu...@tom.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
--- Comment #2 from Allen zhong <zhongyu...@tom.com> ---
thanks for your answer.
how about the following new case.
As member functions const will not change the member variable, so the value
nPair.bins[0] will not change in function exclusion, then we can assert the
return value must be true?
class NPair /*: protected Pointers */ {
public:
int bins[10];
int exclusion(int n) const;
// int exclusion(int n) __attribute__((const));
};
// extern int * __restrict bins;
extern class NPair nPair;
int foo (void)
{
int tmp = nPair.bins[0];
nPair.exclusion(1);
return tmp == nPair.bins[0];
}
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
