https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46726
Richard Smith <richard-l...@metafoo.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|Clang rejects valid code |imprecise diagnostic for
|with "anonymous types |nested unnamed type as
|declared in an anonymous |anonymous union member
|union are an extension" |
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <richard-l...@metafoo.co.uk> ---
Well, Clang doesn't claim that the inner union is an anonymous union, only that
it's an anonymous type, which it is. But that's really irrelevant; nested types
are not allowed at all in this context, and that's what we should be
diagnosing. So the issue is only that the diagnostic is imprecise; it is still
correct and this code is invalid. See
http://eel.is/c++draft/class.union.anon#1.sentence-3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
