https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46676
Fangrui Song <i...@maskray.me> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC| |i...@maskray.me
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song <i...@maskray.me> ---
Hi Andrew,
I think this is another instance that lack of SHT_GNU_verneed support caused
issues (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44842 )
libsymbol_wrapper.so has an undefined symbol shadowed@LIB_GOOD_API_1
LLD older than https://reviews.llvm.org/D80059 treated it as unversioned
shadowed and fetched libbad_symbol.a(bad_symbol.o)
LLD newer than D80059, GNU ld and gold do not fetch
libbad_symbol.a(bad_symbol.o)
% clang -shared -o libsymbol_user.so symbol_user.o libsymbol_wrapper.so
libbad_symbol.a -fuse-ld=gold -Wl,--trace-symbol,shadowed -Wl,-rpath,.
-fuse-ld=lld
libsymbol_wrapper.so: reference to shadowed
libbad_symbol.a(bad_symbol.o): definition of shadowed
% clang -shared -o libsymbol_user.so symbol_user.o libsymbol_wrapper.so
libbad_symbol.a -Wl,-y,shadowed@LIB_GOOD_API_1 -Wl,-rpath,. -fuse-ld=bfd
/usr/bin/ld.bfd: libsymbol_wrapper.so: reference to shadowed@LIB_GOOD_API_1
https://reviews.llvm.org/rGe32f04cdc95224589f30148599c362ba37bae7b6 fixed the
bug. Unfortunately the commit is not in 10.0.1-rc4
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
