https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46115
Sanjay Patel <spatel+l...@rotateright.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #8 from Sanjay Patel <spatel+l...@rotateright.com> ---
(In reply to David Bolvansky from comment #7)
> Is there any testcase in llvm tree to ensure that things will not regress if
> someone in the future tries to add instcombine after licm?
Good point - added a test based on the example here:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/91b45fb527af8f1f83b51e7238642d3af011bad4
That shows the CSE opportunity. This bug is about fdiv sinking/hoisting, so
resolving since there's a Julia bug for that now.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
