https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43223
Renato Golin <rengo...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #9 from Renato Golin <rengo...@gmail.com> ---
Sounds like an accurate description.
I don't like to emulate GCC bugs, but I'm not so fussy about this one in
particular because no one uses "fast" anyway. It's just there for historical
reasons and we do the same to avoid breaking old Makefiles.
Closing...
It would be nice to have a "Expected Behaviour" resolution type, too. Both
"invalid" and "Won't fix" sound a bit aggressive. :)
Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
