https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36526
Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ztur...@google.com
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #5 from Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> ---
Fixed by r347353.
Note that it's not actually necessary to add a DW_TAG_const_type on the pointer
types. They already have DW_at_object_pointer, but even if they didn't, you
can deduce when a pointer is a this pointer when it's the second parameter of
the return-and-argument-types list of a non-static member function.
So we don't need any extra space, and we can still be compatible.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
