https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38990

            Bug ID: 38990
           Summary: llvm-dwarfdump doesn't apply Split DWARF cu_index for
                    debug_loc.dwo
           Product: libraries
           Version: trunk
          Hardware: PC
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P
         Component: DebugInfo
          Assignee: wolfgang_p...@playstation.sony.com
          Reporter: dblai...@gmail.com
                CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org

Created attachment 20888
  --> https://bugs.llvm.org/attachment.cgi?id=20888&action=edit
Incomplete patch

Dumping large dwps produces a bunch of parse failures on debug_loc because the
cu_index entry for debug_loc is not accounted for when parsing the debug_loc
section.

While this example doesn't produce the error message, it does show the bug:

a.cpp:
  void y();
  void a(int i) {
    y();
    asm("" : : : "rdi");
  }

b.cpp:
  void b(int i) { asm("" : : : "rdi"); }

$ clang++-tot -gsplit-dwarf a.cpp b.cpp -c -O1 && llvm-dwp a.dwo b.dwo -o
ab.dwp && llvm-dwarfdump-tot ab.dwp | grep RDI
  Addr idx 0 (w/ length 6): DW_OP_reg5 RDI)
  Addr idx 0 (w/ length 6): DW_OP_reg5 RDI)

But run each .dwo file individually through dwarfdump:

$ llvm-dwarfdump-tot a.dwo b.dwo | grep RDI
  Addr idx 0 (w/ length 6): DW_OP_reg5 RDI)
  Addr idx 0 (w/ length 0): DW_OP_reg5 RDI)


Note the difference in length of these location list entries. This shows that
when dumping b.cpp's CU in ab.dwp, it's reading a.cpp's location list instead
of b.cpp's.

I've attached half a patch that was meant to start plumbing this through. It
isn't quite tied into the actual index lookup/offset yet - in part because of
some issues with the design there, that I'll file in a separate couple of bugs.

There's some other cleanup in this patch too - welcome to commit those parts,
or undo them, etc.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs

Reply via email to