https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38043
Bug ID: 38043
Summary: Explicit array initialization in an initializer list
Product: clang
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P
Component: C++
Assignee: unassignedclangb...@nondot.org
Reporter: zahira.ammarguel...@intel.com
CC: dgre...@apple.com, llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
Let's consider this test case:
#include <stdio.h>
struct foo {
int i;
foo() : i(23) {}
};
struct goo {
goo() {}
goo(const goo & other);
foo _lala[2];
};
goo::goo(const goo & other)
: _lala(other._lala)
{
}
int main()
{
goo z;
if (z._lala[0].i == 23)
puts("passed");
else
puts("failed");
return 0;
}
GCC compiles this.
CL and CLANG both generate an error.
Clang's error message is:
error: array initializer must be an initializer list
If the community doesn't want to follow GCC and allow array initialization via
an initializer list (violation of C++), then clang should at least return the
right error message as this is misleading?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
