https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20804
listm...@philipreames.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from listm...@philipreames.com ---
(In reply to Geoff Berry from comment #1)
> We can now remove the second load in the example when using MemorySSA. Do
> you see any other potential benefit in trying to remove the first store
> instead of the second?
I think you misread the bug report. This was suggesting we remove the second
store in favour of the first.
Having said that, the notion of "generation number" doesn't really apply with
MemorySSA. Given that, I'm fine with closing this because the original
motivation would be addressed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
