https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33047
Jonas Paulsson <pauls...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #12 from Jonas Paulsson <pauls...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> ---
(In reply to Simon Pilgrim from comment #11)
> (In reply to Jonas Paulsson from comment #10)
> > Otherwise, one idea is to use -verify-machineinstrs on those tests so that
> > it is possible to always expect the verifier there. If you think this is ok,
> > could I go ahead and commit, or should I open a review?
>
> This makes sense to me, especially if it means it can stay Generic and be
> tested on all targets. Go ahead and commit if you have tested on all targets.
OK, take a look: r306106
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug._______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
