https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32425
Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espind...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #15 from Rafael Ávila de Espíndola <rafael.espind...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Rich Felker from comment #14)
> Even with the correct interpretation (semantic, not implementation-detail)
> protected still admits efficient calls inside a DSO -- there's no reason to
> make calls through the PLT, only expressions that evaluate the address have
> to take the [PLT]GOT entry into account.
And ABIs don't define which relocations are allowed only on calls.
Please stop reopening this. If you want to make a case for allowing protected
symbols to be preempted discuss that on generic-abic.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs