https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3082
Nick Lewycky <nlewy...@google.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Nick Lewycky <nlewy...@google.com> ---
The .bc format has changed incompatibly since this bug was filed. I don't care
enough to bother finding an llvm 2.5 / 2.6 series compiler to llvm-dis and
upgrade it. It's unlikely the same bitcode will still trigger the same bug,
even if the underlying bug is still unfixed. Closing WONTFIX.
One other thing. "748bc4973cbfe2bac372bd83fb814618e4fc3d9c" isn't a revision
number. LLVM is, for now, still hosted on svn and we use svn revision numbers
as a project. Even when LLVM does go to git, the plan is to use a monotonically
increasing number because those are so valuable.
http://llvm.org/docs/Proposals/GitHubMove.html#on-managing-revision-numbers-with-git
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
