https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31482
Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Aaron Ballman <aa...@aaronballman.com> ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Here's the grammar:
>
> type-specifier-seq:
> type-specifier attribute-specifier-seq[opt]
> type-specifier type-specifier-seq
>
> Note that this only permits attributes at the end of the sequence, not in
> the middle.
Ah, that's a good point. I didn't notice that.
> The other compilers are wrong to accept your example. Perhaps we
> could use the 'misplaced attributes' diagnostic instead, and explicitly say
> where the attributes should be written?
That might not be a bad idea, but I no longer consider this to be a bug with
Clang.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
