https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30445

Renato Golin <renato.go...@linaro.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WORKSFORME                  |---

--- Comment #16 from Renato Golin <renato.go...@linaro.org> ---
This is not good. I'm reopening this.

Could this be the result of Clang optimising (and eliding the problem) with the
code? Or undefined behaviour? I don't know enough about the new standards (or
atomics) to identify undefined behaviour in there.

cheers,
--renato

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs

Reply via email to