https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31002
Richard Smith <richard-l...@metafoo.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Richard Smith <richard-l...@metafoo.co.uk> ---
Per core issue 506, an implementation is required to either reject such code or
make it work:
[expr.call]/9: "Passing a potentially-evaluated argument of class type (Clause
9) having a non-trivial copy constructor, a non-trivial move constructor, or a
non-trivial destructor, with no corresponding parameter, is
conditionally-supported with implementation-defined semantics."
Clang chooses to reject.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
