https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26850
Bug ID: 26850
Summary: Lookup of operator[] succeeds when should be ambiguous
Product: clang
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P
Component: C++14
Assignee: unassignedclangb...@nondot.org
Reporter: barry.rev...@gmail.com
CC: llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
Classification: Unclassified
Consider the following reduced code example from a StackOverflow question
(http://stackoverflow.com/q/35373384/2069064):
struct X{};
struct Y{};
struct B
{
void operator[](X){}
};
struct C
{
void operator[](Y){}
};
struct D : B, C {};
int main()
{
D d;
d[Y()];
}
The call to D::operator[] should be ambiguous due to the two different base
class overloads. A call to d.operator[](Y()) would correctly fail to compile.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
