https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26616
Zhendong Su <s...@cs.ucdavis.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|WORKSFORME |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Zhendong Su <s...@cs.ucdavis.edu> ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hi Zhendong,
> llvmlab bisect suggests that this is the same problem as bug 26628:
>
> $ ./bin/llvmlab bisect --min-rev=260838 --max-rev=261109
> ~/myllvm/build/bin/not /bin/sh -c 'ulimit -t 10; %(path)s/bin/clang -O3
> 26616.c && ./a.out'
> FAIL: clang-r261099-b17473
> PASS: clang-r260928-b17411
> FAIL: clang-r261004-b17441
> PASS: clang-r260957-b17426
> PASS: clang-r260980-b17434
> FAIL: clang-r260989-b17438
> FAIL: clang-r260985-b17436
> FAIL: clang-r260983-b17435
> clang-r260980-b17434: first working build
> clang-r260983-b17435: next failing build
>
> Feel free to mark this as a duplicate (one way or the other...since this is
> the earlier report, but that one has some analysis).
Thanks Sanjoy! Let me mark it as duplicate then.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 26628 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
llvm-bugs mailing list
llvm-bugs@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-bugs
