usx95 wrote: > Do we want to have some built-in handling for overloaded operators as well? > It could be a follow-up PR though.
Added some more tests for overloaded operators. I think they used to work before through CallExpr handling. > I suspect that this PR might not address the case when the dereference is the > LHS on an assignment (like `*p = a`). Right. This case is added in the tests as a TODO. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170006 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
