NagyDonat wrote: > > > Do I understand that this document is primarily intended for the _users_ > > > of the static analyzer? In that case I think it would be important to use > > > the user-facing names of the checkers that are mentioned (e.g. write > > > `unix.BlockInCriticalSection` instead of `BlockInCriticalSectionChecker`). > > > (I'm willing to implement this change if you agree that it's beneficial.) > > > > > > Please do @NagyDonat . The release notes are primarily for end users, and a > > tiny bit also for vendors, like CodeChecker or anyone packaging it in some > > product. > > Fixed in > [2068466](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/206846668cbf4c82da055c2207628dce3f64de43)
Thanks for doing this! I wanted to do this just now, but you were faster than me... https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/154600 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
