OCHyams wrote:

> The original commit seems to have failed a bunch of runners. Can we check if 
> that needs to be fixed before a backport?

Just had a look through the 11 fails - as far as I can tell none of them are 
related to this change. There's still two pending builds 
(`libc-riscv64-debian-dbg`, `sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast`), though IMO it seems 
unlikely those configurations will pick up a problem with this patch that 
others have missed.

Happy to wait longer or wait for another pair of eyes, whatever you think is 
best!

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149053
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to