llvmbot wrote:

<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->

@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-arm

Author: Matt Arsenault (arsenm)

<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>

I'm assuming this was the set of targets that were relevant
for sjlj handling. Just take the raw exception setting instead,
and assume it makes sense for the target.

---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148792.diff


1 Files Affected:

- (modified) llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp (+2-4) 


``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp b/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
index 12aa9dc8d3943..8a130ccfcb50c 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/IR/RuntimeLibcalls.cpp
@@ -72,10 +72,8 @@ void RuntimeLibcallsInfo::initLibcalls(const Triple &TT,
                                        EABI EABIVersion, StringRef ABIName) {
   setTargetRuntimeLibcallSets(TT, FloatABI);
 
-  if (TT.isX86() || TT.isVE() || TT.isARM() || TT.isThumb()) {
-    if (ExceptionModel == ExceptionHandling::SjLj)
-      setLibcallImpl(RTLIB::UNWIND_RESUME, RTLIB::_Unwind_SjLj_Resume);
-  }
+  if (ExceptionModel == ExceptionHandling::SjLj)
+    setLibcallImpl(RTLIB::UNWIND_RESUME, RTLIB::_Unwind_SjLj_Resume);
 
   if (TT.isARM() || TT.isThumb()) {
     setARMLibcallNames(*this, TT, FloatABI, EABIVersion);

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148792
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to